shadow AI detection
Shadow AI Detection for SMB IT Teams
Find unsanctioned AI tools across DNS, proxy, and SSO activity, rank risky usage, and create a practical governance plan before sensitive data leaves the company.
What this search usually needs to answer
Shadow AI detection should show which AI tools employees are using, which teams are using them, and where the highest data exposure risk sits.
Best-fit scenarios
- IT needs visibility into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, coding assistants, meeting bots, and niche AI apps without manually chasing browser history.
- Security teams want to separate harmless exploration from AI usage that may include PII, source code, contracts, credentials, or customer records.
- Operations leaders need a clear governance baseline before writing a company-wide AI policy.
Operating steps
- Connect DNS, proxy, secure web gateway, or SSO metadata exports.
- Normalize domains, app names, user identifiers, departments, timestamps, and access frequency.
- Match activity against an AI tool catalog and assign risk by tool status, data type, and usage pattern.
- Review the top risky tools, approve sanctioned options, block unacceptable tools, and export evidence for compliance reviews.
Common risks to avoid
- A discovery-only inventory can miss the difference between allowed experimentation and sensitive data exposure.
- Overblocking without context pushes employees to personal devices and unmanaged networks.
- Employee monitoring must be lawful, transparent, and aligned with local notice, consent, works council, and privacy requirements.
How ShadowAI Guard fits
ShadowAI Guard turns shadow AI detection into a workflow: discovery, scoring, policy actions, employee usage heatmaps, sensitivity checks, and audit-ready reporting.